What's Next for SC Democrats?
The Reform
Debate
Continues

Your Ideas and Comments #3
This is the third in a series of responses to the
original New Democrats editorial entitled "What Now for South Carolina
Democrats?" written by SC New Democrats Co-
chairs Mayors Floyd Nicholson of Greenwood, Bob
Coble of Columbia and Phil Noble, Director of the
SC New Democrats.
Folks from all across the state have responded to the
editorial and sent in their ideas and opinions of what
we need to do to reform the party so that we can
win again statewide.
Your responses have
been
published in two editions so far:
“Your Ideas and Opinions” #1, #2
And now the third edition. We hope that you have
have found this frank exchange of ideas and debate
interesting and useful. We don’t always agree, but
we think this type of open and honest discussion is
absolutely vital if we are to reform the Party and
win.
None of us, individually, are as smart as all of us
together - and we need as many voices as possible
to be heard.
Now, it’s
your turn. Read what others have
said and
give us your ideas and suggestions.
Thanks and stay tuned.
Phil Noble
Director
PS -
Forward this to some of
your friends that you
think might be interested.
From a First Time House
Candidate
In the 2006 election cycle, I did something that I
believe that everyone should do at least once in their
lives... run for public office.
It was one of the most incredible experiences in my
life. I have never been more humbled and encouraged
by the positive connection that this experience has
brought me. I learned so much, I met so many great
people and I had the opportunity to share my vision
about how we move South Carolina forward into the
21st Century. People responded to that vision in
many inspiring ways and they made a decision to
lend their support to me.
My campaign took place in House District 79
(Richland and Kershaw Counties). I ran for the South
Carolina House of Representatives as a Democrat. I
challenged a 12 year Republican incumbent (that has
never had serious opposition) in a district that is one
of the fastest growing districts in the state of South
Carolina over the last 15 years. More
Anton Gunn, Columbia
anton@antongunn.com
Winning – From a Businessman in
Charleston
After reading the What's Next for SC Democrats I
find it important to send you a thought.
If one wants to win one must first decide that they
will not loose. All in this state that claim to be
Democrats and have a desire to win should be
required to read, " The Art of War" by Sun Tzu.
Failure can not be an option. One must plan,
execute the plan, follow-up with all involved in the
plan, continue to execute, and win. What I see is
talk, talk, talk, but leadership is lacking and winning
is secondary to talking about winning.
I've worked on two campaigns with Mayor Riley with
our group coming in up front with and attitude of
failure is never an option. Planning is the entire key
with timing running a close second if not first. I look
forward to discussions concerning this matter. I'm
fed up with the way our country is allowing citizens
in our armed forces to be killed and injured for life in
the ridiculous wars we are waging.
So many other issues to talk about but the overall
battle ground must to waged with clear, concise
planning and executed by those that have an
attitude of "Failure is never an option."
Gene King, Charleston
gking@seqinv.com
Do We Need a ‘Big Tent’?
We must rethink the idea of the "Big Tent." I
thought this meant that all ideas were welcomed and
that the party of the "Big Tent" (the Democratic
party) does not shy away from debate to come up
with solid solutions to the many problems we face in
South Carolina. We have allowed the Republican
party to become the New Democratic party where
everyone is welcomed (including black folks), and
take a seat at the table where ideas and debate is
welcomed. As an African American with young
children, we are more in tuned to politics than ever
before.
We are not concerned with bigger government but
better government; we don't care about more money
in education but better education for all children. i.e.
fix the system (and yes we are the ones that have
children in this broke system that's not working and
our children are suffering), and we don't want to be
discussing another 20 years how we are going to
create economic development in rural South Carolina
but we must devise strategies that recognize South
Carolina's competitiveness in the world and whatever
strategies we develop must take the global market
place into account.
New democrats must be just that..."New
Democrats." When the late Senator Isadore Lourie
asked me to join the DLC some years before his
passing, he said I want you to join because we must
have African Americans involved that will think
differently for the future and the sustainability of the
Democratic Party. We cannot be New Democrats
ladies and gentlemen with the same old messages.
Stephen Gilchrist
sgilchrist1@sc.rr.com
Goldwater, Race and Women
It is indeed interesting to read the various opinions
expressed by the responders. I was raised to be a
Democrat because nobody had ever seen a
Republican, which obviates the fact that I am old. I
went to college and got educated (in the ways of
the world). When Barry Goldwater ran for President, I
cast my first vote for him because he was painfully
honest and turned out to be right. Therefore, I
always consider candidates on my perception of their
honesty, more than their issues.
An honest person is more likely to call BS where
obvious while a politician will equivocate. Lyndon
Johnson was far from honest so I did not vote for
him. During this period, segregation had reared its
ugly head and many friends and neighbors had a
Republican enlightenment... blacks were Democrats,
they weren't. There, I almost said it. The South rose
again...rebelled...and became real white and real
Republican. They also got real religious? I guess they
couldn't stand themselves in the dark of night so
they called on the LORD to sanction their "beliefs." In
the process, both sides of the issue lost their "home
training,” thus the current state of public
education...missing parentage.
We must educate children as early in life as
possible...a child that qualifies for college can get
funded. A hungry and unhabilitated 3 year old can't.
Lottery money should be totally "EARLY CHILDHOOD
FUNDING." Unfortunately, Kerry was right about how
one winds up in IRAQ...it ain't Harvard. SO here we
are in SC, a third world state with an ethereal
Governor. We have no vision in leaders.
As a businessman, I learned to never hire a man to
do a job that a women could do. Women get it done
while men talk about it (and them Gamecocks). We
have the better part of two years to develop the
female population of SC into educated voters who
will participate in the political process. Once
educated, they can not possibly be Republicans,
DUH? Electable candidates must be cultivated now.
The lights will shine on SC in the presidential
primary...let's get ready to rumble.
Don Yonce, Myrtle Beach
Domoyosr@aol.com
From a Transplanted
Retiree
Here as in the rest of the world should integrate and
promote equal rights to health, quality education
(out of state if necessary to bring high school
quality up to qualify for out-of-state schools), job
opportunities (and,
yes, labor unions) and loans for small businesses
headed by women and other
minorities.
Too many rich white males run things, decide who
gets jailed (NOT rich white males) or gets good legal
representation, adequate housing, quality
transportation allowing holding down full-time jobs
and Split-shift or varied-shift jobs and getting to
educational opportunities.
I moved here to retire, because of the climate and
the strides in integration
made so far, but I NEVER would have educated my
children here in this
bigoted backwater with Dixie League sports and poor
public transportation.
No one else should have to be forced to put up with
inferior resources
either.
Jean Affleck, Mount Pleasant
jaffleck@bellsouth.net
This Project and "Three Women From
Charleston"
I think what you're doing is great. It's opening up a
great dialogue.
I was hoping it would continue. I read Connie Green's
piece
over and over and found it to be both timely (with
Hillary's potential Presidential bid hanging in the
balance) and also oxymoronic. There may be
elements of truth to the idea that women can often
be women's own worst enemies, and it intrigued me
how she seemed to be outraged by that, yet at the
same time criticizing other women for not doing what
she'd like to see other women do.
I really would like to see an open dialogue among
folks who have run for office before and received
little-to-no help from the Dem. Party and hear what
they have to say about what they think would have
made their campaigns better/what help did they
expect and did not get? Things like that.
More
Tara McGuinness, Mt. Pleasant
taramcguinness@comcast.net
Join
the Debate
Tell us what you think. We welcome any
and
all ideas
and comments.